Skip to main content
Beancount.io LogoBeancount.io
Mike Thrift

Mike Thrift

Marketing Manager

View all authors

FinQA: The Benchmark Measuring AI Numerical Reasoning on Financial Reports
·mike

FinQA: The Benchmark Measuring AI Numerical Reasoning on Financial Reports

FinQA (EMNLP 2021) built 8,281 QA pairs from S&P 500 earnings reports requiring multi-step arithmetic programs. Neural models scored 61% at release versus 91% for human experts; accuracy collapses to 22% on three-or-more-step programs. The failure modes — domain constants, cross-modality grounding, chain length — map directly to the challenges Beancount agents face today.

ai
machine-learning
llm
finance
+2
FinanceBench: Why Vector-Store RAG Fails on Real Financial Documents
·mike

FinanceBench: Why Vector-Store RAG Fails on Real Financial Documents

FinanceBench evaluates 16 AI configurations against 10,231 questions from real SEC filings; shared-vector-store RAG answers correctly only 19% of the time, and even GPT-4-Turbo with the oracle passage reaches just 85% accuracy — showing that numerical reasoning, not retrieval, is the binding constraint for enterprise finance AI.

ai
llm
machine-learning
financial-reporting
+3
DSPy: Replacing Brittle Prompt Engineering with Compiled LLM Pipelines
·mike

DSPy: Replacing Brittle Prompt Engineering with Compiled LLM Pipelines

DSPy replaces hand-crafted prompt strings with declarative signatures and a metric-driven compiler—boosting Llama2-13b from 9.4% to 46.9% on GSM8K math reasoning and offering a more maintainable path for production finance AI pipelines.

ai
llm
machine-learning
automation
+2
LATS: Language Agent Tree Search — 추론, 행동, 계획을 하나의 프레임워크로 통합
·mike

LATS: Language Agent Tree Search — 추론, 행동, 계획을 하나의 프레임워크로 통합

LATS(Language Agent Tree Search, ICML 2024)는 ReAct, Tree of Thoughts, Reflexion을 단일 MCTS 프레임워크로 통합하여 GPT-4와 함께 HumanEval에서 92.7%의 pass@1을 달성했습니다. Git 기반의 Beancount 장부의 경우, 운영 환경에서 LATS를 제한하는 상태 복원 요구 사항을 아주 쉽게 충족할 수 있습니다.

ai
llm
machine-learning
automation
+3
Self-RAG: Adaptive Retrieval and Self-Critique for LLMs
·mike

Self-RAG: Adaptive Retrieval and Self-Critique for LLMs

Self-RAG (ICLR 2024 Oral) trains a language model to decide when to retrieve and then grade its own results using four reflection tokens — reaching 55.8% on PopQA and 80.2 FactScore on biographies while outperforming ChatGPT on five benchmarks. Analysis covers the mechanism, ablation results, reproducibility limits, and implications for finance AI agents over Beancount ledgers.

ai
machine-learning
llm
technology
+3
Voyager: Skill Libraries as the Foundation for Lifelong AI Agent Learning
·mike

Voyager: Skill Libraries as the Foundation for Lifelong AI Agent Learning

Voyager, a GPT-4-powered Minecraft agent from NVIDIA and Caltech, demonstrates that a persistent code skill library enables genuine lifelong learning without fine-tuning — discovering 3.3× more items than prior state-of-the-art. The pattern maps directly onto long-horizon Beancount ledger automation, though financial correctness demands staging layers that game sandboxes never require.

ai
llm
machine-learning
automation
+3
HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for LLMs
·mike

HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for LLMs

HippoRAG (NeurIPS 2024) builds a knowledge graph from OpenIE triples and applies Personalized PageRank at query time, reaching 89.1% Recall@5 on 2WikiMultiHopQA versus 68.2% for ColBERTv2—with direct implications for querying complex financial ledgers across multi-year transaction histories.

llm
ai
machine-learning
beancount
+3
AgentBench:评估作为代理的 LLM —— 对金融 AI 可靠性的启示
·mike

AgentBench:评估作为代理的 LLM —— 对金融 AI 可靠性的启示

AgentBench(Liu 等人,ICLR 2024)在 8 个交互式环境中对 27 个大语言模型进行了基准测试 —— GPT-4 的综合得分为 4.01,而表现最好的开源模型仅为 0.96。三种主要的失败模式(知识图谱失败中 67.9% 为超出任务限制、数据库失败中 53.3% 为格式错误以及无效操作)直接对应了在真实账本上部署 Beancount 回写代理的风险。

ai
llm
machine-learning
automation
+3
BloombergGPT and the Limits of Domain-Specific LLMs in Finance
·mike

BloombergGPT and the Limits of Domain-Specific LLMs in Finance

Bloomberg trained a 50B-parameter LLM on 569B tokens of financial data and beat general models on sentiment and table-reasoning benchmarks — then GPT-4 matched it without any finance-specific pretraining. What the $10M experiment reveals about domain pretraining trade-offs, tokenization of numbers, and why tool-use is more reliable than model internals for accounting agents.

llm
ai
machine-learning
finance
+3
AutoGen: Multi-Agent Conversation Frameworks for Finance AI
·mike

AutoGen: Multi-Agent Conversation Frameworks for Finance AI

AutoGen (Wu et al., 2023) introduces a multi-agent conversation framework where LLM-backed agents pass messages to complete tasks; a two-agent setup lifts MATH benchmark accuracy from 55% to 69%, and a dedicated SafeGuard agent improves unsafe-code detection by up to 35 F1 points — findings directly applicable to building safe, modular Beancount automation pipelines.

ai
llm
automation
beancount
+3
Gorilla: How Retrieval-Aware Training Reduces LLM API Hallucinations from 78% to 11%
·mike

Gorilla: How Retrieval-Aware Training Reduces LLM API Hallucinations from 78% to 11%

Gorilla (Patil et al., NeurIPS 2024) fine-tunes a 7B LLaMA model with Retriever-Aware Training on retrieved API documentation, cutting hallucination rates from 78% to 11% versus GPT-4 zero-shot — with direct implications for finance AI write-back agents where wrong account names or inverted signs are correctness failures, not annoyances.

ai
llm
machine-learning
automation
+3
MemGPT: Virtual Context Management for LLM Agents
·mike

MemGPT: Virtual Context Management for LLM Agents

MemGPT applies OS-style virtual memory paging to LLMs, using three-tier storage — working memory, recall, and archival — to give agents persistent recall across sessions; on multi-session chat benchmarks, MemGPT with GPT-4 achieves 92.5% accuracy versus a 32.1% fixed-context baseline.

ai
llm
machine-learning
automation
+4
Showing 61–72 of 87 posts